Congress has passed a budget resolution that mandates cuts in the federal Medicaid
program of $10 billion over the next five years. The resolution only indicates
Congress’ resolve, it is not law at this time. The resolution contains
no specifics as to how the $10 billion in cuts will be achieved.
The Secretary for Health and Human Services, Michael Leavitt, has appointed
a commission to look into the matter. The commission is scheduled to make recommendations
to Congress by mid-September. In addition to the HHS commission, the National
Governor’s Association (“NGA”) has weighed in on this matter.
For most states, the cost for Medicaid exceeds 50% of the state’s budget.
On June 1, 2005, the NGA Executive Committee adopted “EC-16” Medicaid
Reform Policy. Portions of EC-16 are likely to be given consideration by Congress
is formulating any new Medicaid laws.
Important points of EC-16 are:
Reverse Mortgages. The NGA is recommending that Congress require
homeowners to pay for their care through the use of reverse mortgages on their
homes. A homeowner would not be approved for Medicaid until after a reverse
mortgage had been put in place.
Transfer of Assets. Current law creates a period of ineligibility
for Medicaid when non-exempt assets are transferred to a third party as part
of a strategy to “impoverish” the Medicaid applicant. This period
of ineligibility is generally calculated by the dividing the average monthly
cost for a nursing home in the state by the amount transferred. For example,
if $100,000 is transferred and the average monthly cost for a nursing home is
$5,000, the person would be ineligible for Medicaid coverage for 20 months.
EC-16 proposes to begin the period of ineligibility from the date the person
applies for Medicaid as opposed to the date that the person makes the transfer.
This will severely impact the ability to use transfers as part of a strategy
to qualify for Medicaid coverage.
Family Contribution. The NGA is encouraging Congress to adopt
policies that would encourage individuals and their families to self-finance
long-term care rather than rely on Medicaid. This may mean that children may
be required to contribute to the cost of custodial care of their parents.
Cost Sharing. The NGA is also looking to establish premiums,
deductibles and co-payments for certain services provided through Medicaid.
Corporate Welfare. The Governors are concerned that those
companies that provide health insurance for their retirees are at a competitive
disadvantage to foreign corporations in countries offering universal health
care as well to companies that choose not to offer health care assistance to
their retirees. The NGA suggests that Congress come up with a plan to shift
some of the cost from the good citizen corporations to some sort of a “reinsurance
mechanism.”
How does this affect you and your clients? Those clients who have implemented
a Medicaid plan to gradually transfer non-exempt assets may want to accelerate
their timetable. It may make sense to transfer the residence before a new law
is put in place. For those clients that can afford it, long-term care insurance,
purchased alone or as part of a Medicaid asset protection plan, may make even
more sense today than it did a year ago.
Our law firm focuses its practice on elder law and estate planning issues.
Your clients can contact us to schedule an appointment to discuss Medicaid planning
options that might be available to them.
medicaid, Health and Human Services, Leavitt, HHS, national governor's association, NGA, EC-16, Reverse Mortgages, assets, family contribution, custodial care, cost sharing, corporate welfare, reinsurance mechanism, elder law